|
Bound Together Ministries Debbie W. Wilson |
Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them; and them which suffer adversity, as being yourselves in the body. Hebrews 13:3 |
|---|
:
The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:
Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:
New Study Shows Abortion Hurts Women's Mental Health
Source:
Elliot Institute; August 14, 2002
New
Study Shows Abortion Hurts Women's Mental Health
Springfield,
IL -- Six months after her abortion, Jane had a mental breakdown.
When she later delivered a healthy son, unresolved grief over her
abortion contributed to severe post-partum psychosis. "I
remember wanting to throw him out the window of the hospital room,"
she later told her therapist.
A study published in the July
issue of the American Journal of Orthopsychiatry reveals that both
the early and delayed psychiatric episodes
experienced by Jane
are significant risks associated with abortion. By examining Medi-Cal
records for 173,000 low-income California women, the research team
compared the rate of psychiatric outpatient treatments for women who
had abortions versus those who carried to term. To control for
differences in prior psychological health, they excluded all women
who had any psychiatric care for a year prior to their pregnancy
outcome.
Women were 63 percent more likely to receive mental
health care within 90 days of an abortion compared to delivery. In
addition, significantly higher
rates of subsequent mental health
treatment persisted over the entire four years of data examined.
Abortion was most strongly associated with subsequent treatments for
neurotic depression, bipolar disorder, adjustment reactions, and
schizophrenic disorders.
Dr. Priscilla Coleman, the study's
lead author, said that the study design was an improvement over
previous studies because it relied on medical records
rather than
on surveys of women contacted at an abortion clinic.
"Most
studies of mental health status after an abortion rely on small
groups of women^×usually less than 300^×and face high
drop out rates of 50 percent
or more," said Coleman, a
professor at Bowling Green State University in Ohio. "By looking
at medical claims for a large group of women, we were able
to
capture a more accurate picture of the differences between abortion
and childbirth."
Another of the study's authors, Dr.
David Reardon, said, "Our results are likely to underestimate
the true difference in psychological treatments
because the
information on obstetric histories was incomplete. Since many of the
women classified as 'Ñchildbirth only' actually had prior
abortions which
we did not know about, this would most likely
dilute our findings."
Reardon is the co-author with Dr.
Theresa Burke of a new book, "Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain
of Abortion," in which Jane's experience, summarized
above,
is included as part of a comprehensive review of post-abortion
reactions. (See www.forbiddengrief.com).
"Forbidden Grief" was recently
highlighted as the book
of the week selection by radio talk show host Dr. Laura
Schlessinger.
Reardon believes the results these recent
studies underscore a key message of "Forbidden Grief."
"We
need to expand outreach and referrals into post-abortion counseling
programs," he said. "There are many women who have great
difficulty coping
with the emotional stress following an
abortion. Without help, and especially the understanding of loved
ones, they will be more vulnerable to
self-destructive behavior
and other psychological disorders."
Public interest in
the health effects of abortion was last raised in 1989. Surgeon
General Koop reviewed the research on abortion at the request of
President Reagan. Koop concluded that all the studies done up to
that point was so methodologically flawed that no firm conclusions
could be
drawn about abortion's risks or benefits.
In a
letter to the outgoing president, Koop recommended that a major
federally funded longitudinal study of abortions health risks was the
only
way to secure definitive answers. His proposal for a major
study died in the Democratically controlled congress, however, when
abortion advocates argued
that the appeal for such research was
politically motivated and a waste of tax payer dollars.
Pro-life
internet